Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Stefano's avatar

Great read and happy to see you're going all-in.

Just a few points to consider for your questions.

1. James Bond was a novel, real life is different. Hidden in plain sight. Also, stringers, free lance professionals, newspapers use this business model to great effect. And roles change as careers progress. Ghislaine's dad was into scientific journals and knowledge, and he has a very interesting life, connected with Israel's secret service. Being a fundraiser-influencer helps gatekeeping and keeps one in the loop of the latest research.

2. Ceo-blindspot, etc. Also money opens doors, but finding the right door isn't common knowledge. Power depends on who you know, there's many different forms. Assuming all billionaires automatically can get access to what's against the rules, first they need to find a pimp. This stuff is not advertised.

3. Because he's a moron who's addicted to octopuses. Also, Epstein is connected to the US three letter agencies. And we're assuming the US secret service isn't onboard.

4. Ceo-blindspot. And maybe it was also a regular normal island for unsuspecting folks.

5. Masonic symbols and I've seen at least one Israeli embassy that looks similar. Coincidence? That's a nice blue btw. Greece is full of white and blue painted homes too. That building reminds me of the Mediterranean. It's a nice color scheme, minus the unfortunate connotations.

You're probably right, his parties were probably a lot of fun. Gatsby set the standard.

And it sounds like mafia 101. And it's more mundane and common than it sounds.

As for your third option, that's our entry into the wonderland.

The only question remaining is, if the greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist, then does God exist?

There's a great book called the greatest hoax of all time written by a french man in the 1800s worth checking out.

You're right, real power is hidden and access, like the new rich marrying the old aristocracy, is legendary.

I look forward to watching your lecture. Good stuff and may you be blessed with love and light.

Expand full comment
Forest Kingfisher's avatar

Good evening, Professor,

We would like to propose a competing game theory model for this collection of degenerates who rule the western world, which may also alleviate your concerns for your own safety, assuming this model is correct.

If we were a clever member of the elite, we would eventually want all of these backstabbing sociopaths to cooperate so we could rule the world. However, backstabbing sociopaths are very hard to control and spend a lot of their energy and time plotting against one another. So, what if we gave them all the means to destroy each other, like the doctrine of mutually assured destruction employed with nuclear nations? Then, they would all cooperate because anyone backstabbing another would lead to their own destruction. If every politician and billionaire has video evidence of criminal conduct, say on an island with under-aged girls and we carefully made sure every one of them was filmed doing something before we revealed this to them all, they would all fall in line for the preservation and benefit of the group.

Now, Jeffrey Epstein was a useful idiot, but as soon as someone outside the western elite got him in custody, the only option was to eliminate him. It did not matter how boastful or obvious he was up to that point - we would only care if something could be proven to an outside authority. Epstein was tolerable up until he became a liability. We assume making an example of him would only assist us in enforcing cohesion in the group. This isn't ritualistic, but someone smart making them all operate like they were allies. In addition, we would not care about what anyone outside our group suspected, even a professor in Beijing; unless they had evidence, we could safely ignore them.

Does this model fit the facts? What could we predict with this model?

Expand full comment
36 more comments...

No posts