45 Comments
User's avatar
Stefano's avatar

Great read and happy to see you're going all-in.

Just a few points to consider for your questions.

1. James Bond was a novel, real life is different. Hidden in plain sight. Also, stringers, free lance professionals, newspapers use this business model to great effect. And roles change as careers progress. Ghislaine's dad was into scientific journals and knowledge, and he has a very interesting life, connected with Israel's secret service. Being a fundraiser-influencer helps gatekeeping and keeps one in the loop of the latest research.

2. Ceo-blindspot, etc. Also money opens doors, but finding the right door isn't common knowledge. Power depends on who you know, there's many different forms. Assuming all billionaires automatically can get access to what's against the rules, first they need to find a pimp. This stuff is not advertised.

3. Because he's a moron who's addicted to octopuses. Also, Epstein is connected to the US three letter agencies. And we're assuming the US secret service isn't onboard.

4. Ceo-blindspot. And maybe it was also a regular normal island for unsuspecting folks.

5. Masonic symbols and I've seen at least one Israeli embassy that looks similar. Coincidence? That's a nice blue btw. Greece is full of white and blue painted homes too. That building reminds me of the Mediterranean. It's a nice color scheme, minus the unfortunate connotations.

You're probably right, his parties were probably a lot of fun. Gatsby set the standard.

And it sounds like mafia 101. And it's more mundane and common than it sounds.

As for your third option, that's our entry into the wonderland.

The only question remaining is, if the greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist, then does God exist?

There's a great book called the greatest hoax of all time written by a french man in the 1800s worth checking out.

You're right, real power is hidden and access, like the new rich marrying the old aristocracy, is legendary.

I look forward to watching your lecture. Good stuff and may you be blessed with love and light.

Expand full comment
Forest Kingfisher's avatar

Good evening, Professor,

We would like to propose a competing game theory model for this collection of degenerates who rule the western world, which may also alleviate your concerns for your own safety, assuming this model is correct.

If we were a clever member of the elite, we would eventually want all of these backstabbing sociopaths to cooperate so we could rule the world. However, backstabbing sociopaths are very hard to control and spend a lot of their energy and time plotting against one another. So, what if we gave them all the means to destroy each other, like the doctrine of mutually assured destruction employed with nuclear nations? Then, they would all cooperate because anyone backstabbing another would lead to their own destruction. If every politician and billionaire has video evidence of criminal conduct, say on an island with under-aged girls and we carefully made sure every one of them was filmed doing something before we revealed this to them all, they would all fall in line for the preservation and benefit of the group.

Now, Jeffrey Epstein was a useful idiot, but as soon as someone outside the western elite got him in custody, the only option was to eliminate him. It did not matter how boastful or obvious he was up to that point - we would only care if something could be proven to an outside authority. Epstein was tolerable up until he became a liability. We assume making an example of him would only assist us in enforcing cohesion in the group. This isn't ritualistic, but someone smart making them all operate like they were allies. In addition, we would not care about what anyone outside our group suspected, even a professor in Beijing; unless they had evidence, we could safely ignore them.

Does this model fit the facts? What could we predict with this model?

Expand full comment
Predictive History's avatar

Yes, this makes perfect sense, and it's excellent game theory analysis. What this model suggests is that there is paralysis among the elite, and that they're incapable of saving themselves. So much effort is spent on maintaining secrecy and group cohesion that the elite is no longer able to strategize, and to innovate. As things get worse, they'll just double down on their existing strategies. That's why we're seeing a greater commitment to Ukraine even though the war is lost. Also, this paralysis suggests the rise of a Caesar figure (such as Donald Trump). The elite does not know how to deal with Trump because he's evaded all their traditional modes of control (they don't have any blackmail on him).

Expand full comment
Forest Kingfisher's avatar

We observe that Donald Trump acts more like a backstabbing sociopath/player without the mutually assured destruction (MAD) condition; he spends his time and energy on competing with the other players as one might before this method of control were in place.

Other western politicians and billionaires might be cooperative even if they did not have the MAD condition granted/imposed on them. Figures such as Warren Buffet or Joe Biden benefit from going with the flow and working with all the corrupt people who seemed to be cooperating with each other. Perhaps they are not as sociopathic or ambitious, so required no coercion. If the elite assumed Donald Trump would be like these less sociopathic players - after all he did not seem very ambitious nor threatening as a reality TV star and real estate billionaire - they underestimated him. He did rise like Julius Caesar, accepted by the elite with the assumption he would play the game like the other players. Caesar turned on his fellow elites much to their surprise. Would the elites today cooperate to destroy Trump the way the senators of Rome destroyed Caesar? Is Trump threatening enough to matter to them? Are they too lazy and complacent at this point to care i.e. paralyzed and stagnating?

We shall have to think on this a bit more, but we see your point. As a minor upside, this would also mean that the infighting at the top makes theorists like us even less threatening as they all focus on each other. We might very easily go unnoticed and educate regular people for a long time without fear. We are not elite dissenters like Seneca/Musk nor outside threats like Cleopatra/Putin.

We look forward to your next lecture - this is all fascinating material.

Expand full comment
Lionel's avatar

Whatever the elite do or do not do, and whether they care what truth we guess, the Shaytan/Mara will still have us if watching them (with popcorn) makes us forget the state of our own lives and fidelity to Principle/Oneness. This is Plato's cave after all - the far more important truth.

Expand full comment
Forest Kingfisher's avatar

Most certainly. We are no longer fond of Plato's cave because hyper-reality has replaced the shadows on the wall, and unfortunately it is more real than real. We hypothesize that we are more like blind people in a cave (like creatures who have dwelt for generations underground), and we depend on others now to tell us what even the shadows look like. This makes the dark illusion of reality and vice all the more potent.

Expand full comment
Lionel's avatar

If this is correct, then during this Iron Age we would be wise to take revelatory Guidance seriously --- and to cling to any true refuges tested and found tenaciously.

Expand full comment
Dave B.'s avatar
7dEdited

Thanks for another thought-provoking episode, Professor.

Some points:

1. There were two islands owned by Epstein - two of anything smells of an intel operation in case the first one fails/is exposed, of course;

2. re: your question: "How can we explain all these paradoxes and contradictions?" Its an error to underestimate human nature. For some, power is an aphrodisiac. Imagine the orgies that go on amongst the elites in D.C. If you want to get an inkling into what I'm alluding to watch the Stanley Kubrick directed movie "Eyes Wide Shut" - for its symbolism;

3. See if you can find the excellent clip of the late US comedian Bill Hicks' skit on the Kennedy assassination. It speaks volumes as to where *real power in our society lays;

4. re: you don't know who the Elites are - if you want to know, discover for yourself who we cannot criticize;

5. Lastly, you'll know that you've got too close to the truth when you're "cancelled" on YT, etc.

(from one who who was banned from FB -and who's account was not reinstated after an appeal - and given no reason as to why).

Expand full comment
LenChai's avatar

Interesting. I have also a hard time to make sense of the Epstein case. What I think it’s obvious is that the story has been rendered too mutilated now to make it possible any truthful reconstruction. I have some objections to the anonymous and invisible powerful. I have a too low consideration of human species to allow even the most nefarious people be able to organize in a trustful and cohesive way, even if they (or especially so) evil as you think. History is full of secret and invisible things that have been used to indicate causal effects where there is no proof of any. Keep the good work professor, I enjoy the experience of reading your work and watching your classes.

Expand full comment
Truth's avatar

Its fairly obvious to find out who the global elite. Paper money isn't real money, real assets and tangible wealth is. Its the international bankers, you cannot hide wealth if you are of that extreme level, nor does it convince anyone. Follow the trails, look for the similarities. It's not as easy as one dominates them all, but a majority can swing the direction. The "goal" of the international bankers is/was to create a one world government (Which is already here in the form of the current global financial system) as from feudalism (times of war for survival) to the renaissance times (economic cities, and times of economics as survival) , therefor the profusely rich have no obligations or ties to a nation and simply engage in the system which serves them. If your country is doing poor, and they are turning on you? Simply move countries with your wealth along the boat of the global financial system. In the past good luck transporting your wealth across a nation when a war is occurring in your home nation or in modern terms if you aren't apart of that system good luck moving your wealth if you are ostracized in your country. But again like many nations which rise and fall, all are doomed to fail with the delusions of grandeur. Furthermore, a system based on interest is doomed to burst (A system designed to fail , and its cons benefit the wealthy) , this is simple mathematics and the bankers know it. Compounding interest propped by artificial paper money numbers easily siphons wealth into the richest which is controlled anytime by the printer, and why is it that an economic crash which seems to happen in cycles (the boom bust cycle, which fiat that replaced the gold standard promised to abolish). Money was chosen because it was a better alternative to war (debatable as the "best option") , and perhaps its idealistic to think that people would choose peace if given the choice, especially in today's modern world due to the corruption. Generations would need to die with new ideas brought forth the same way Moses wasn't allowed to enter the promised land and only the next generation was. You can't change the majority of an old generation, you can only teach/brainwash the new generation. The race of the 19th and 20th century was relearning how to control the masses in the western world due to vastly increased communication and forms of media, and forms of media when not using your own critical thinking quickly turns into brainwashing (newspaper, radio, music, movies, plays, etc). Gustav le bons crowd psychology, how to control the masses. If its inevitable that multinetworked, and rapid communication of global affairs, I am still a believer in the philosopher king aristocracy, with a society geared towards harmony. But I am also aware that corruption is inevitable if the population grows too big, or enough time passes, what is the solution?

Expand full comment
Parth Bansal's avatar

The only question remaining is, if the greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist, then does God exist?

(maslow's hierarchy)SELF-ACTUALIZATION(Highest Need): Pyramids, Epstein Island, Epstein Temple, Capitalism, Secret Socities, Secret Families, Deep State, Mutual Blackmail, Co-Hesion, Breaking Social Taboos, Individual Game, 1$ Bill Illuminati, The Founding Fathers, tHE Secret Society, Washington DC Map, Gihslaine’s Dad, Espionage Teams, CIA(Catholic Intelligence Agency), Child Sacrifice, Pedophilia, Gay Cohesion, Idea of Individual, Epstein Media Coverage, No Interview of Gislaine Maxwell, JFK Assassination(Release the files, if the country is free) etc. All these things make sense.

They are within us, And their biggest power is COHESION & SECRECY & access to infinite money & BANKS & POWER

Expand full comment
Cher's avatar

well written professor! I am following the brave Candace Owens, she had these stuff connecting and sued by the Macrons because of Brigitte's transgender personality being exposed and the pedophilia surrounding them, connecting all to mossad, the jews and Israel. It's sickening.

Expand full comment
Engineer's avatar

Maybe something to explore. I believe the global elite have some roots in marocco as maroccan magicians are known to be the best magicians in the world who can actualy communicate with demons and als have a bug base of maroccan jews and also the only arab country who has a strong connection with israel

Expand full comment
Engineer's avatar

Best lectures ive ever listened to. This is some of the most interesting things ive ever heard and i finaly feel like im exploring subjects on my tought level. Everything just clicks, maybe a bit to good. Only fear i have is starting to prank people to get enough cohesion with my friendgroup to take over the world 🤣

Expand full comment
Parth Bansal's avatar

Everything makes perfect sense now.

The Illuminati does exist, the all seeing eye behind the 1 USD note had a meaning, the most powerful club of elite people, the world govt. does exist. We were fooled, they were right in front of our eyes and all this time we were just fighting with each other.

Expand full comment
Aegon's avatar

Pls share what you are smoking so I can join you too.

Expand full comment
Ikhsan M Noor's avatar

“The world is meant to be ruled by one.”

Elite Global

Expand full comment
Robin Shaban's avatar

"When I was much younger, I fantasized about working in an insane asylum so that I could eavesdrop on the inmates’ conversations. Then I discovered the Internet, and realized I could just listen to Kurt Metzger talk to his friends." 🤣🤣🤣

Thanks for another great read, Professor!

"They believe that they hold divine power and black magic, that they’re reincarnations and they’re able to communicate with extra-dimensional aliens." This reminds me of the hot minute in my 20s where I was really into Vajrayana Buddhism (cringe, I know). Perhaps the power network you are looking to model here has their own traditions and beliefs, but I also wonder how this intersects with more mainstream religions that have esoteric practices. Catholicism has elements of this, for example. Do esoteric spiritual practices go hand-in-hand with concentrations of power? My hypothesis is that they would because people who wield exceptional power would need some sort of mental schema to internalize and comprehend their power. But I haven't researched this at all.

Expand full comment
Bernhard Schneider's avatar

Before you speculate any further: the common knowledge about Epstein´s last hours is that he was put off suicide watch and he had no cell mate at the time of his death. The Tartaglione "cohabition" dates from a few days before his end. Seems to be SOP there to get a cell mate only during suicide watch.

Expand full comment
clip's avatar

Its worth studying personalities for something like the epstein case. There doesnt seem to be much hard evidence for events. A study of suspected characters in the case through the lense of the Enneagram or the big 5 personality model may reveal underlying desires, weaknesses, tendencies. It may be more fruitful to reveal what was likely to have happened. I havent really seen study of character in your work professor, maybe worth looking into it. Most of it stems from the work of Carl Jung. Although, as you point out, people with true power hide in the shadows and pull the strings are immune to being analysed. Search for evidence of discipline in suspects as this may invalidate the usefulness of studying ones character more as a discplined person is able to pick and pull the best attributes for all personalities through the lens of reason.

Expand full comment
GeorgesSC's avatar

What happened to this week’s lecture(s)? Uh oh

Expand full comment
Charlie Prime's avatar

If you wish to learn how and why the Epstein Financial Network developed, read Whitney Webb's years of uncensored journalism and books on the subject:

https://unlimitedhangout.com/epstein/

Expand full comment